Who's Online

We have 1266 guests online

Live Traffic Feed

Life in the Skies

'A Local Bestseller!'

What Tony says
(See here)
and Book Launch video here
 
What others say

Les Posen
(See
here)

Yvonne Lee
(See
here)

Louisa Lim & Allan Koay
(See
here)

Aireen Omar, Asran & Bo Lingam
(See
here)

38 Readers' Comments
(See here)

Get an autographed copy here

AMAZON.COM  -  To Order, please Click here 

(eBook) Kindle edition - please Click here

Latest Comment

Thunderstorms and th
Hi Captain Lim, I would like to know if there ha

What happens if I ge
I have seen a comment from a Flight attendant that

What are the eyesigh
Captain, I am in class 11 in India and want to bec

What are the eyesigh
PLEASE stop asking about your eyes!!! Read the art

Vomiting on long hau
I have traveled a lot (almost 2 million miles) the

Can you become an ai
Hi captain , I had an accident 15 yrs ago and ha

Does a jet aircraft
Reading through the comments was both entertaining

Does a jet aircraft
So many nonsense here... Earth isn't flat. Period.

What are the cruisin
"how in the hell can you reach JFK if you leave fr

What are the eyesigh
tjsoihsdojfsioufs f post

Paperback Version

 For Local Availability - Check Here
 
Home
Are the Airbus A380 engines more powerful than those of the Boeing 777?
Written by Capt Lim   
Thursday, 24 August 2006 09:02

Hi Captain Lim,

Thanks abundantly! It impresses me ever to see you, not only having advanced into what you desired, but pursuing it further from all corners - such as this remarkable website of yours!

A Question: The Airbus A380 engines are massive and its titanium blades are prominently much broader. Yet they produce a thrust of 70,000 pounds each as compared to the smaller Boeing 777 engines that produce a heftier 92,000 pounds of thrust each.

Please explain.

Thanks and Blessings.

Glen Reuben
USA

Hi Glen,

Yes, the Airbus A380 may be one of the largest passenger aircraft (second only to the Russian Antonov AN225) in the world today, but its engines (four Rolls Royce Trent 900 Turbo fan) are not necessary the most powerful. They may look massive with their titanium turbine blades or *prominently broader* but the record goes to the Boeing 777 engines.

Each RR Trent 900 has been cleared to eventually certify at 81,000 lbs of thrust (more than 75,000 HP). It is currently being run at 76,500 lbs (about 71,000 HP)

The Boeing 777-200 IGW (now also known as the Boeing 777-200ER) that I flew, was fitted with the Trent 892 engines and produce up to 90,300 lbs of thrust each. In fact, the real record for the world*s most powerful engines goes to GE90-115B engines fitted onto the Boeing 777-300ER. Each engine produces up to 115,300 lbs of thrust!

Ah, but remember, the Airbus A380 has 4 engines. So the total thrust is multiplied four times (76,500 x 4 = 306,000 lbs of thrust) as compared to the two engines of the Boeing 777-300ER (115,300 x 2 = 230,600 lbs of thrust). Overall, the Airbus A380 is still more powerful.

The Airbus A380, with the RR Trent 900 engines, will be the first long-haul aircraft to consume less than three liters of fuel per passenger over 100 kilometers (approximately 81 miles per US gallon) ? a fuel consumption comparable to the best of the small modern turbo-diesel cars.

From the Rolls Royce website, here are some more interesting facts: 

. At take-off, the A380*s four Trent 900s will deliver a thrust equivalent equal to the power of more than 3,500 family cars. 
. The engine*s hollow, titanium fan blades suck in over 1.25 tons of air every second and could empty four squash courts per second. 
. The fan operates at nearly 3,000 rpm with tip speeds at 1.5 times the speed of sound. 
. By the time the air leaves the exhaust it has been accelerated to a speed of nearly 1,000 miles per hour. 
. Temperatures in the engine core are half those on the surface of the sun. 
. The blades in the engine*s high-pressure system rotate at 12,500 rpm, with tip speeds reaching 1,200 miles per hour. 
. Each Trent 900 has around 20,000 individual components.

 
Why the Airbus A380 does not have winglets similar to the A340?
Written by Capt Lim   
Sunday, 19 February 2006 08:45
Dear Captain Lim,

I am currently waiting for my 2nd interview from Cathay Pacific that is being held next week. After browsing through the Internet, I found someone posting a few technical questions being asked during his 2nd stage interview. At this moment, I am still unable to answer those questions. Would you please give me a hand on them?

1. Why did A380 and A340 have different type of winglets? Why did Airbus use the same type of winglet originally designed for the A320 and implement it on A380 instead of using the type for A340?

2. If the static tube on the pressure head is iced up during the descent, what will the altimeter indicate? What will happen to the airspeed indicator?

3. Why modern aircraft uses the Directional Indicator instead of a compass? How does a Directional Indicator work? Does it work with a compass? Does a Directional Indicator has deviation and variation corrections as applied on a compass?

I hope to receive your response soon.

Regards,

Benny

Hi Benny,


1. First you have to understand the reasons of having winglets on planes. See answers to one of my previous FAQ.


Anyway, lets review on some issues concerning the debate on why there are no winglets on the Boeing 777 and why Airbus A330/340 has them.

Boeing chose to increase the span of the wing rather than add winglets. By increasing the wingspan, it also increases wing efficiency. Increasing the wing by 4/5 of the height of winglets will have the same effect as having a winglet. Yes, winglets reduce wing tip vortices and therefore induced drag. But they have disadvantages: If one of the winglets is damaged and removed, it would burn an extra 1 % more fuel and the take off weight may be reduced by as much as 15,000 to 30,000 kg. On the Airbus, the weight of the winglets helps to reduce bending moments on the outer wing during flight. Without it, the outer wing will be able to twist and bend to a higher degree for any given weight.

The increased wingspan on the Boeing 777 creates a higher aspect ratio (a measure of how long and slender a wing is from tip to tip - the square of the span divided by the wing area) on the wings, thus improving the take off, climb and cruise performance without adding winglets ? hence reducing the simplicity and construction cost of the wing design.

Now, to go back on your question on why the Airbus A380 did not follow the Airbus A330/340 winglet design but rather more or less imitate the old design ?wingtip fences? of the Airbus A320. Basically winglets help to reduce induced drag and improve performance (also increases aspect ratio slightly). However, the Airbus A380 has very large wing area due to the large wingspan that gives it a high aspect ratio. So, it need not have to worry about aspect ratio but needs only to tackle the induced drag problem. Therefore, it does not require the winglets, but merely ?wingtip fences? similar to those of the Airbus A320.

2. If the static tube on the pressure head is iced up during the descent, what will the altimeter indicate? What will happen to the airspeed indicator?

a. If the static tube of the pressure head is iced up, the static pressure inside the altimeter will remain constant. Therefore the altimeter will display the altitude when the static tube was iced up even though the plane may be climbing or descending. For example, the icing was encountered at 5000 feet; the height will indicate 5000 feet even if you were at 10,000 feet or 1000 feet!

b. In the case of the airspeed indicator (ASI), a static tube blockage would cause the static pressure in the ASI to remain constant. The ASI reading would be correct at constant altitude. However, during a descent, it will overread (due to trapped low static pressure of higher altitude) and underread (due to the trapped high static pressure of the low altitude) during a climb.

3. Why modern aircraft uses Directional Indicator instead of a compass? How does a Directional Indicator work? Does it work with a compass? Does a Directional Indicator has deviation and variation same as a compass?

The modern aircraft uses the Direction Indicator (DI) or directional gyro (DG) instead of a compass because it gives a more steadier (due to rigidity) heading information to the pilot than a basic compass (eg. those used by scouts or trackers on the ground).

To understand how a DI works, you must understand the principle of the gyroscope. A gyroscope is a body rotating freely in space that has the property of rigidity and precession.

The DI uses an internal gyroscope whose stability provides accurate directional information once it is set to the correct heading. Because the earth rotates at 15? per hour and because of small-accumulated errors caused by friction, the DI will drift over time. It must be reset from the compass periodically - once each fifteen minutes of flight. Failure to do will give rise to navigation errors among new pilots.

So basically, a DI is a gyroscope that displays the aircraft heading by making use of a compass rose display. The gyroscope axis is aligned to the true north.

The DI suffers from turning and acceleration errors but any deviation and variation corrections are applied to the aircraft track only. Remember, the magnetic compass works with the DI as a single instrument known as the remote indicating compass (RMI)
 
Do you know anything about this Super Jumbo?
Written by Capt Lim   
Thursday, 17 November 2005 10:11

Dear Captain Lim,

I know there will be a Super-Jumbo jet being put into service soon and that is by far the greatest commercial plane. Do you know anything about this brand-new plane? Do you think your company will operate this plane?

How different will it be in controlling such a huge jet from the present Boeing 747-400?

Thanks for sharing your opinion.

Royce

 
<< Start < Prev 111 Next > End >>

Page 111 of 111

Paperback Version

 For Local Availability - Check Here

Recommended By..


LIFE IN THE SKIES

'A Local Bestseller!'

Recommended by

Patrick Smith
Boston USA
(See
here)

Capt Meryl Getline
ex-United Airlines USA
(See
here)

Capt Doug Morris
Canadian Airlines
(See
here)

Capt  Robert J Boser
ex-United Airlines USA
(See
here)

38 Readers' Comments
(See here)

Get an autographed copy here

AMAZON.COM  -  To Order, please Click here 

(eBook) Kindle edition - please Click here

View Book Launch video here

Follow me

@CaptKHLim

Like What You Read?


If you like what you read, more stories are found in my book LIFE IN THE SKIES (Preview here) and you can purchase a copy here. To check for any latest updates or postings, you can follow my Twitter at @CaptKHLim or Facebook here

MH 370 Interviews

Click here to View

10 Most Popular Posts



Disclaimer | Privacy
2004 - 2011 © AskCaptainLim.com | Site Concept by eQuilec.com